Sweden Proposes Stricter Citizenship Rules, Raises Residency and Income Requirements
- 11 hours ago
- 2 min read
Sweden’s government has unveiled plans to significantly tighten its citizenship laws, introducing stricter residency, income, and conduct requirements as part of a sweeping reform of its naturalisation process.
Under the proposed changes, individuals seeking Swedish citizenship would be required to reside in the country for at least eight years, an increase from the current five-year requirement. The reform also introduces a financial benchmark, mandating applicants to demonstrate a stable monthly income exceeding 20,000 Swedish kronor (approximately $2,225).
Migration Minister Johan Forssell said the new measures represent a sharp departure from existing rules, which he described as relatively lenient. He noted that, at present, there are minimal financial conditions tied to citizenship eligibility. The revised framework, he explained, is designed to ensure that new citizens are financially self-sufficient and well integrated into Swedish society.
The proposal also includes stricter consequences for individuals with criminal records. According to the minister, applicants with prior convictions—whether in Sweden or abroad—would face extended waiting periods before becoming eligible to apply. For instance, a person who has served a four-year prison sentence could be required to wait up to 15 years before submitting a citizenship application.
In addition to residency and income standards, the government plans to introduce mandatory language and civic knowledge tests. Prospective citizens would need to demonstrate proficiency in the Swedish language and show familiarity with the country’s culture, laws, and social norms.
Officials argue that the reforms are intended to strengthen integration and foster shared values, emphasizing that citizenship should reflect both commitment and contribution to Swedish society. Supporters believe tougher requirements will promote long-term stability and reinforce social cohesion.
However, critics warn that the stricter criteria could disproportionately impact lower-income immigrants and families, potentially making full integration more difficult rather than easier. They argue that raising financial thresholds may exclude otherwise law-abiding residents who contribute in non-financial ways.
Comments