Trump Threatens Military Deployment in Minnesota Amid Rising Protests Over Immigration Enforcement
- Ajibade Omolade Chistianah
- 4 days ago
- 2 min read

Tensions in Minneapolis escalated this week as President Donald Trump warned of invoking the Insurrection Act to deploy military forces in response to widespread protests against federal immigration enforcement. The unrest follows the fatal shooting of a U.S. citizen by an immigration officer, which has sparked nationwide demonstrations.
Protests initially focused in Minneapolis have spread to neighboring cities, with demonstrators confronting heavily armed federal agents patrolling the streets. Residents reported frequent use of tear gas and flash-bang grenades during clashes with officers.
A separate incident involved the shooting of a Venezuelan man after authorities attempted to stop his vehicle. Federal officials said the man resisted arrest, resulting in defensive gunfire. Both the officer and the suspect were hospitalised.
Many residents have criticised federal agents for aggressive tactics, including detaining bystanders and smashing car windows. Civil rights advocates say these measures disproportionately targeted minority communities, heightening public outrage.
President Trump has publicly blamed state officials for failing to control protesters, while Minnesota leaders have criticised federal actions as heavy-handed and inflammatory. The standoff has prompted a national debate over immigration enforcement and the limits of executive authority.
Nearly 3,000 federal officers are currently deployed in the Minneapolis area. Armed in military-style gear, they continue to patrol streets amid ongoing demonstrations. Some residents have vandalized property in protest, expressing frustration over both the shooting incidents and broader immigration policies.
The Insurrection Act, which permits a president to federalize state troops or deploy the military domestically, has rarely been used in modern U.S. history. Legal experts note that invoking it could trigger constitutional challenges.
Public opinion remains divided. Polls indicate a split between those who support aggressive enforcement and those who prioritise avoiding civilian harm. Activists warn that further escalation could lead to prolonged unrest and deeper community divisions.













Comments